Credit: fee.org
After reading the Memorial against Non-English Immigration (1727), write a brief response to the material. Use this as an opportunity to discuss some of the major issues or themes in the text. While you will need to re-state some of what is in the textbook to formulate your answer, you must elaborate on what you’ve read. Continue reading
Credit: kcm.org
Analyze one case that the U.S. Supreme Court or the California Supreme Court has written a decision on preferably within the last five years, although older cases may be selected if of particular interest to the student. The case brief should have a case citation (parties involved and year of the case), brief facts (only the most important facts that the court relied on), issues (the question(s) to be resolved by the court), holding/rule of law (the precedent established by the case, which is the court’s answer(s) to the issue(s), reasoning/rationale (why the court ruled as it did), other opinions (e.g., concurring, dissent), and your own brief analysis. Continue reading
Credit: prezi.com
Describe the importance of federalism with regards to the Controlled Substance act of 1970. Use one current source from a news article for an example, not scholarly sources. . Continue reading
Credit: shiftcomm.com
There are two major paradigms of research: quantitative and qualitative. Which of these paradigms are you inclined to participate in or design? Why? Continue reading
Credit: rogerogreen.com
Watch the movie 12 Angry Men and write a reflection essay explaining how the jurors’ experiences do or do not relate to the concepts presented in the text. Please provide specific examples. Also, discuss how, based on your assessment of the jurors’ experience, decision-making in juries can be improved. Be specific with your recommendations and explore if they are realistic based on your knowledge of the judicial system. Continue reading
Credit: vivekvsp.com
Write a persuasive, thesis-driven, well-supported, and original essay that proposes a theory to the question: “How does a writer change a paradigm?” Your answer must take the form of a focused, sustained thought about a specific rhetorical technique you’ve observed in the course readings. You will not be making a list of claims about multiple rhetorical strategies that writers use. Continue reading
Credit: balkaneu.com
Look at the struggle of the powerful men represented in San Francisco’s Queen of Vice (District Attorney Pat Brown, Tom Lynch, etc.) to end the corruption, which they see as initiated by Inez Burns. With Burns finished, do they go after the men involved in a vice? Why or why not? Continue reading
Credit: goodreads.com
San Francisco’s Queen of Vice details the life of abortionist Inez Burns from the turn of the century forward. Using what you have learned in this class of the expected roles for women, examine how Burns defies these expectations, compare and contrast her to the other female characters in the book, and finally, assess her successes and failures. Continue reading
Credit: happify.com
The lessons we learn from experiencing setbacks can deeply affect our later success. How has a delay in your admission to XYZ affected you and what lesson(s) have you taken away that you believe will aid you in the future?”. Continue reading
Credit: wodfriends.org
Write a fictional historical narrative about a major event that occurred during the Civil War period. This is a story you create using historical facts. The work should be 550 words and use two sources to construct the factual framework. You do not need to cite them in the text though since it is like a historical novel. Instead, use that supporting information to build as factual of an environment as you can within the work. Continue reading
© 2024 Blog
Theme by Anders Noren — Up ↑
Recent Comments